We just put up a new story on the website that may be of some interest to nonprofits in New Jersey. Our own Sam Fanburg reports that the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs (NJDCA) is accepting public comment on a proposed mandatory donor designation disclosure. If it were to pass, nonprofits would be required to give donors a way to designate funds for specific programs. Here are some more details from the story:
According to the "pre-proposal" under N.J.A.C. 13:48-11.2, the NJDCA believes that “if particular programs are the inducement for a donor to make a contribution to the charity, the donor should be advised that he or she has the option to direct the charity to use his or her contribution to fund that program.” Any nonprofit that receives more than $250,000 in its previous fiscal year would have to include a designation allowing donors to choose what specific program their contribution would fund.
In a seven-page letter addressed to the acting director of the NJDCA, Errol Copilevitz, a partner in the Kansas City, Mo., firm of Copilevitz & Canter, LLC, tackled his own misgivings about the proposal finding a misunderstanding of fundraising by the state. “The rule fails to recognize a basic axiom of charitable fundraising, to-wit: it costs money to make money,” he wrote.
The proposed rule makes no allowance for cost and would mislead donors into believing their designation will require “100 percent of their donation to go to program services (when such a request is impossible),” according to Copilevitz. Especially in a nonprofit’s infancy, many times it costs more than a dollar to raise a dollar, but securing that initial relationship with donors allows an organization to cultivate future contributions.
As you can see, there are some concerns being raised about this proposal. In addition to Copilevitz, the Center for Non-Profits in New Brunswick, NJ also has some issues with it. Among other things, they believe it could lead to additional administrative costs such as printing, fund allocation and bookkeeping. If your organization wants to make any comments on the proposal, send it to this address:
Thomas Calcagni, Acting Director
New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs
P.O. Box 45037
Newark, NJ 07101
And be sure to read the full article on The NonProfit Times website.
Friday, July 15, 2011
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Commission Adopts Model Protection Of Charitable Assets Act
Here is an excerpt from a story we recently published on our website:
The Model Protection of Charitable Assets Act (MPCAA) received approval from the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) Tuesday during the ULC’s annual meeting in Vail, Colo.
Approval means that individual states can use the act or any part of it as a model for regulation of nonprofit organizations, though they are not required to use any of it. The new act replaces the Uniform Supervision of Trustees Charitable Purposes Act, passed in 1954.
In a statement after the vote, the ULC said the goal of the PCAA is to “protect the role of the states with respect to charitable assets, by clarifying the role of the Attorney General.
“The attorney general’s authority in most states is broad and this act will not limit or narrow that authority, while providing many states the first clear statutory articulation of that authority.”
You can read the full story by visiting The NonProfit Times on the web.
The Model Protection of Charitable Assets Act (MPCAA) received approval from the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) Tuesday during the ULC’s annual meeting in Vail, Colo.
Approval means that individual states can use the act or any part of it as a model for regulation of nonprofit organizations, though they are not required to use any of it. The new act replaces the Uniform Supervision of Trustees Charitable Purposes Act, passed in 1954.
In a statement after the vote, the ULC said the goal of the PCAA is to “protect the role of the states with respect to charitable assets, by clarifying the role of the Attorney General.
“The attorney general’s authority in most states is broad and this act will not limit or narrow that authority, while providing many states the first clear statutory articulation of that authority.”
You can read the full story by visiting The NonProfit Times on the web.
26 Years of Live Aid
Even with today's technology, the concept of Live Aid is still extremely impressive. At the time, the event was one of the most ambitious broadcasting events of the time, with both concerts being carried by different networks: BBC in London and ABC in America. In addition, MTV carried an entirely separate feed of the US concert. During the broadcast, viewers were urged to call in and donate money to the cause.
And donate they did; the concerts raised over $100 million for famine relief in Africa. Adjusted for inflation, that number would be $200 million today. Imagine if one of your fundraisers got that kind of money; you'd be set!
While there were other fundraising concerts before and after, Live Aid was an important event in the history of philanthropy and fundraising. It led directly to other "aid" concerts, like Farm Aid, and was the pre-cursor to benefit concerts like those for Haiti and Japan, and Stand Up 2 Cancer, aired on most major television networks. Feel free to share your thoughts on how Live Aid may have impacted philanthropy and fundraising below, as well as any memories you may have of the concerts.
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Ethnic Donors: NPTtv Interviews Nelson Bowman
In fundraising, targeting the best prospects is very important. In order to raise the most money possible, you have to be able to identify the top donor groups out there, and focus a lot of attention on them. Nelson Bowman, director of development at Prairie View A&M University, spoke to The NonProfit Times TV about why targeting ethnic donors should be a key priority for fundraisers. Specifically, we asked him the following questions:
- Why should nonprofits be thinking about specifically targeting ethnic groups when it comes to their appeals and giving programs?
- How is messaging different when targeting specific ethnic groups?
- Anything else to think about besides the message or the type of message? Are there other aspects to the giving and the philanthropy among those ethnicities that a charity would have to think about before setting out in that direction?
- Any other specific strategies or other strategies that charities should be thinking about when they set out to appeal to other ethnic groups?
- Do charities target ethnic groups now, or is it a matter of making it front of mind and reminding them that the demographics showing that you should be appealing to different donor groups by ethnicity?
- Anything else charities should think about when just starting out a program like this, to focus a little more on ethnic groups in their appeals; is there a good first step or two that they should do before they engage?
NPTtv Summary: Bates Tops List Of Most Expensive Colleges
Note: This is a summary of a story from the newest episode of The NonProfit Times TV.
Looking to spend a little more on colleges this year? Then these schools will be right up your ally.
The US Department of Education has released a list of the most expensive colleges in the country. Maine’s Bates College, with a price tag of $51,300, was named the priciest private, nonprofit college for 2009-2010. In comparison, the average price of tuition for a public university was under $6,400. Here are some other colleges on the list:
Looking to spend a little more on colleges this year? Then these schools will be right up your ally.
The US Department of Education has released a list of the most expensive colleges in the country. Maine’s Bates College, with a price tag of $51,300, was named the priciest private, nonprofit college for 2009-2010. In comparison, the average price of tuition for a public university was under $6,400. Here are some other colleges on the list:
- Connecticut College: $51,115
- Middlebury College, Vermont: $50,780
- Sarah Lawrence College, New York: $41,968
NPTtv Summary: Clinton To Launch Micro-Lending Plan
Note: This is a summary of a story from the newest episode of The NonProfit Times TV.
In an effort to help small business owners in regions that were devestated by the recession, Former President Bill Clinton has launched a micro-lending plan that he hopes will bring much needed capital to these struggling businesses.
Called Kiva City, it was announced during the annual Clinton Global Initiative Summit. The effort will be headed by micro-lending nonprofit Kiva, as well as Visa, Inc. Kiva City will offer small business lending strategies to suffering American cities like Detroit, Milwaukee, and Pittsburgh. They will also give out loans of about $7,000, which will be used to pay rent, buy equipment, or cover other daily operations.
In an effort to help small business owners in regions that were devestated by the recession, Former President Bill Clinton has launched a micro-lending plan that he hopes will bring much needed capital to these struggling businesses.
Called Kiva City, it was announced during the annual Clinton Global Initiative Summit. The effort will be headed by micro-lending nonprofit Kiva, as well as Visa, Inc. Kiva City will offer small business lending strategies to suffering American cities like Detroit, Milwaukee, and Pittsburgh. They will also give out loans of about $7,000, which will be used to pay rent, buy equipment, or cover other daily operations.
NPTtv Summary: End of Nonprofit Board Ban?
Note: This is a summary of a story from the newest episode of The NonProfit Times TV.
Could a 15-year ban be coming to an end?
If The Office of Government Ethics (OGE) has its way, federal employees will be allowed to serve on nonprofit boards without approval from their agencies. The organization published a proposed rule in the Federal Register to do away with that regulation, which has existed since it was first passed in 1996. They noted in their new proposal that the supposed conflicts of interest between an employee’s job and their financial duties to a nonprofit are more theoretical than real. Therefore, they argued, the regulation was not necessary.
Whether this rule will become law is anybody's guess, but it's certainly something to keep an eye on.
Could a 15-year ban be coming to an end?
If The Office of Government Ethics (OGE) has its way, federal employees will be allowed to serve on nonprofit boards without approval from their agencies. The organization published a proposed rule in the Federal Register to do away with that regulation, which has existed since it was first passed in 1996. They noted in their new proposal that the supposed conflicts of interest between an employee’s job and their financial duties to a nonprofit are more theoretical than real. Therefore, they argued, the regulation was not necessary.
Whether this rule will become law is anybody's guess, but it's certainly something to keep an eye on.
NPTtv Summary: We're Out Of Here: Two Nonprofit CEOs Call It Quits
Note: This is a summary of a story from the newest webcast of The NonProfit Times TV.
Two major nonprofit CEOs came back after the July 4th weekend to decleare their independence from their organizations.
Steve Gunderson, of the Council on Foundations, and Robert D. Reischauer, of the Urban Institute, announced they were stepping down from their positions. Gunderson, who was CEO for six years, announced he would be retiring effective September 1st. In an open letter on the COF website, he said it was “the right time for a transition.”
Reischauer, who lead the Urban Institute for 11 years, will step down as CEO at the end of 2011. During his tenure, the organization established the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and refocused its interdisciplinary research on welfare reform for low-income working families.
Two major nonprofit CEOs came back after the July 4th weekend to decleare their independence from their organizations.
Steve Gunderson, of the Council on Foundations, and Robert D. Reischauer, of the Urban Institute, announced they were stepping down from their positions. Gunderson, who was CEO for six years, announced he would be retiring effective September 1st. In an open letter on the COF website, he said it was “the right time for a transition.”
Reischauer, who lead the Urban Institute for 11 years, will step down as CEO at the end of 2011. During his tenure, the organization established the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and refocused its interdisciplinary research on welfare reform for low-income working families.
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
New NPTtv Out Tomorrow
The newest webcast of The Nonprofit Times TV will be out tomorrow! Here's a sneak peek at the stories you can expect to see:
- "We're Out Of Here"
- "New Federal Rules For Boards"
- "Clinton Launches Micro-Lending Plan"
- "The Most Expensive Colleges"
- "Targeting Ethnic Donors"
Monday, July 11, 2011
AFP Poll: Changes To Charitable Deduction Will Hurt Giving
Fundraisers have made it clear they expect a drop in donations if the Obama Administration's plan to limit the charitable deduction is approved, according to a story that was just published on our website. How much that decline would be, however, is up for debate.
The plan, which is part of the White House's Fiscal Year 2012 budget, would cap itemized deductions at 28 percent for the richest Americans. In a Quick Poll by the Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP), three-quarters of those surveyed said the plan would negatively affect giving. When it comes to how much giving would be affected, however, participants were split. Here's how the numbers break down:
The plan, which is part of the White House's Fiscal Year 2012 budget, would cap itemized deductions at 28 percent for the richest Americans. In a Quick Poll by the Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP), three-quarters of those surveyed said the plan would negatively affect giving. When it comes to how much giving would be affected, however, participants were split. Here's how the numbers break down:
- 27 percent predict a 25-percent drop in gifts
- Another 27 percent believe it will be around a 5 to 10-percent decrease
- Finally, 23 percent think the decline will be at 5 percent
Friday, July 8, 2011
Discussion: CEO Changes
We just posted a discussion on our LinkedIn profile about the recent CEO changes that have been occuring at nonprofits. The question is below:
Earlier this week, Steve Gunderson, President and CEO of The Council On Foundations, announced he would be resigning in September. There have also been a number of CEO changes, like at Save the Children and Catholic Relief Services. What advice would you have for these new generation of leaders?
Feel free to start off the discussion by visiting us on LinkedIn.
Earlier this week, Steve Gunderson, President and CEO of The Council On Foundations, announced he would be resigning in September. There have also been a number of CEO changes, like at Save the Children and Catholic Relief Services. What advice would you have for these new generation of leaders?
Feel free to start off the discussion by visiting us on LinkedIn.
Japan Easing Towards Nonprofit Groups
Note: This is a summary of an article from an outside news organization. To read the full article, click on the links in this post.
It's no secret that Japan has a negative view of nonprofit organizations. During natural disasters, such as the recent tsunami or the 1995 Kobe earthquake, the government advised relief organizations to keep away. Those that came anyway found that it was almost impossible to get anything done. This is because the country lacks a long history of private philanthropy. Support for those in need is supposed to come from the family, and nonprofits are viewed as interfering. And with restrictive laws in place, life for nonprofits in Japan is very difficult. All this is about to change, however, according to a story in The Economist. Well, at least for the most part.
On June 22, a law was passed in Japan that will allow nonprofits to get tax relief much easier. Currently, only 223 of the 90,000 NPOs in Japan have a special tax status. To put this in even greater perspective, that number is at 160,000 in the UK and 1.8 million in the US. The new law will drastically change the way the current cumbersome process is handled. Now, municipal authorities will handle the certification process instead of the national tax agency handling certification. This is a big deal, as the latter views most NPOs as a detriment to the country's finances. Other changes include:
If you want to read the full story, head on over to The Economist.
It's no secret that Japan has a negative view of nonprofit organizations. During natural disasters, such as the recent tsunami or the 1995 Kobe earthquake, the government advised relief organizations to keep away. Those that came anyway found that it was almost impossible to get anything done. This is because the country lacks a long history of private philanthropy. Support for those in need is supposed to come from the family, and nonprofits are viewed as interfering. And with restrictive laws in place, life for nonprofits in Japan is very difficult. All this is about to change, however, according to a story in The Economist. Well, at least for the most part.
On June 22, a law was passed in Japan that will allow nonprofits to get tax relief much easier. Currently, only 223 of the 90,000 NPOs in Japan have a special tax status. To put this in even greater perspective, that number is at 160,000 in the UK and 1.8 million in the US. The new law will drastically change the way the current cumbersome process is handled. Now, municipal authorities will handle the certification process instead of the national tax agency handling certification. This is a big deal, as the latter views most NPOs as a detriment to the country's finances. Other changes include:
- The so-called "public support test" will be scrapped, removing a huge burden for nonprofits eligibility.
- Contributions will be nearly 50% tax-deductible. This is an increase from the current 10% level
If you want to read the full story, head on over to The Economist.
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Nonprofits Gain Reprieve From Minnesota Debt Crisis
If you've been following the news lately, you might have heard about the Minnesota government shutdown. It all started when Gov. Mark Dayton, a Democrat, attempted to close a $5-billion deficit by increasing taxes on residents making $1 million or more, as well as instituting some budget cuts. The Republican controlled state senate, however, wanted only spending cuts. Since no deal was made by midnight on June 30th, all non-essential government services were halted.
This created a scare for some nonprofits in the state, such as BLIND Inc, who feared that that shutdown would severely handicap them and the people that rely on their services. However, a district court eventually ruled that BLIND Inc and several other Minnesota nonprofits count as essential services, allowing them to operate as normally. Here is an excerpt from the just released story from The NonProfit Times:
On the first day of rulings, Gearin ruled that the services provided by BLIND Inc. and Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services were essential. She also included the state’s licensing agencies so licenses can be renewed, but she did not include the agency that issues nurse registration.
The ruling came as good news to Shawn Mayo, executive director of BLIND Inc. in Minneapolis, which offers training to the blind. She said her organization was able to continue without cutbacks in services because it could draw from general funds. It has 15 full-time staff and three summer temporary staff. It will be adding five more summer temps next week. The organization serves 40 to 45 people and will begin its children’s program the second week of July.
Mayo said the staff was discussing options even before the shutdown and was willing to take whatever steps necessary to keep running.
“We were quite concerned about how long we could continue to provide services and about further sustainability,” Mayo said. She added that even though her organization can operate, it is a referral agency, so she is concerned that counselors to whom clients would have been referred and who are out of work may face serious backlogs when they do return to work.
“Our students are thrilled (about the ruling),” Mayo said. “They didn’t have anywhere else to go. And they’re what it’s really about.”
You can read the full story at The NonProfit Times website.
This created a scare for some nonprofits in the state, such as BLIND Inc, who feared that that shutdown would severely handicap them and the people that rely on their services. However, a district court eventually ruled that BLIND Inc and several other Minnesota nonprofits count as essential services, allowing them to operate as normally. Here is an excerpt from the just released story from The NonProfit Times:
On the first day of rulings, Gearin ruled that the services provided by BLIND Inc. and Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services were essential. She also included the state’s licensing agencies so licenses can be renewed, but she did not include the agency that issues nurse registration.
The ruling came as good news to Shawn Mayo, executive director of BLIND Inc. in Minneapolis, which offers training to the blind. She said her organization was able to continue without cutbacks in services because it could draw from general funds. It has 15 full-time staff and three summer temporary staff. It will be adding five more summer temps next week. The organization serves 40 to 45 people and will begin its children’s program the second week of July.
Mayo said the staff was discussing options even before the shutdown and was willing to take whatever steps necessary to keep running.
“We were quite concerned about how long we could continue to provide services and about further sustainability,” Mayo said. She added that even though her organization can operate, it is a referral agency, so she is concerned that counselors to whom clients would have been referred and who are out of work may face serious backlogs when they do return to work.
“Our students are thrilled (about the ruling),” Mayo said. “They didn’t have anywhere else to go. And they’re what it’s really about.”
You can read the full story at The NonProfit Times website.
Catch Up on eNewsletters From The NonProfit Times
Did you know you can view all of our past eNewsletters on The NonProfit Times' website? By visiting our eNewsletter page, you can take a look at all of our past (and current) messages. This is a handy feature for a number of reasons. First, if you were ever thinking of subscribing to them, you will now get a better idea of the kind of content you will be receiving. On the other hand, it allows you to catch up on issues you might have missed if you hadn't been subscribed since the first newsletter came out.
As a reminder, here are the newsletters we currently offer:
-NPTimes Weekly-Get updates on the latest trends in nonprofit management. Sent every Monday.
-NPTimes Jobs-Delivers the latest news on nonprofit jobs, including the latest positions from our job board. Sent every Tuesday.
-Exempt-The companion eNewsletter to The NonProfit Times’ sister publication, Exempt Magazine. Sent third Tuesday of each month.
-NPTimes TechnoBuzz-The latest trends in nonprofit technology can be found in this eNewsletter. Sent second Tuesday of each month.
-NPTimes Instant Fundraising-Need help with fundraising for your organization? This is the newsletter for you. Sent every Wednesday.
-NPTtv Newsletter-Sent every other Wednesday with the release of the new NonProfit Times TV webcast. Includes links to the individual stories in the new episode.
All of these newsletters are available to view in our archive, so check them out. Just scroll down past the article categories to the section entitled "eNewsletters" and select the edition of the newsletter you want to view. And if you are interested in signing up for any of these e-mails, visit our newsletter subscription page.
As a reminder, here are the newsletters we currently offer:
-NPTimes Weekly-Get updates on the latest trends in nonprofit management. Sent every Monday.
-NPTimes Jobs-Delivers the latest news on nonprofit jobs, including the latest positions from our job board. Sent every Tuesday.
-Exempt-The companion eNewsletter to The NonProfit Times’ sister publication, Exempt Magazine. Sent third Tuesday of each month.
-NPTimes TechnoBuzz-The latest trends in nonprofit technology can be found in this eNewsletter. Sent second Tuesday of each month.
-NPTimes Instant Fundraising-Need help with fundraising for your organization? This is the newsletter for you. Sent every Wednesday.
-NPTtv Newsletter-Sent every other Wednesday with the release of the new NonProfit Times TV webcast. Includes links to the individual stories in the new episode.
All of these newsletters are available to view in our archive, so check them out. Just scroll down past the article categories to the section entitled "eNewsletters" and select the edition of the newsletter you want to view. And if you are interested in signing up for any of these e-mails, visit our newsletter subscription page.
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Management Tip: 7 Essentials to Attracting Great Employees
Here is a recent management tip direct from The NonProfit Times website. Check the management tips page often, as new ones are added every week.
***
Wondering why your organization has trouble attracting good employees?
Well, that article in The New York Times reporting your CEO has been found certifiably insane sure didn’t help, but in fact when it comes to hiring and retention, the times they are a changing.
In their book “Brand For Talent,” Mark Schumann and Libby Sartain offer information meant to show that getting and keeping top employees means awareness that present-day employees are not the same as those who grew up during the Depression, even if they are dealing with the Great Recession.
Schumann and Sartain offer seven essentials that can help deal with a new situation.
• Wake up. Today’s job-seekers see themselves, not you, as the consumers. With a world of information at their fingertips, and the savvy to maneuver it, they are looking for something that satisfies them.
• Look ahead. You might have to market yourself as a good place to work. Think sensibilities, challenges, lessons, opportunities, the future.
• Create. A company must creatively market its employer brand to each segment of worker it hopes to secure.
• Segment. As with marketing, segmenting means adapting the talent brand message for each segment based on insight into audience needs and preferences.
• Implement. Be recognized, believed, personalized, and remembered.
• Sustain. There must be alignment of the culture, corporate identity and the consumer and employer brands.
• Survive. Be aware of and utilize social media to your benefit.
***
Wondering why your organization has trouble attracting good employees?
Well, that article in The New York Times reporting your CEO has been found certifiably insane sure didn’t help, but in fact when it comes to hiring and retention, the times they are a changing.
In their book “Brand For Talent,” Mark Schumann and Libby Sartain offer information meant to show that getting and keeping top employees means awareness that present-day employees are not the same as those who grew up during the Depression, even if they are dealing with the Great Recession.
Schumann and Sartain offer seven essentials that can help deal with a new situation.
• Wake up. Today’s job-seekers see themselves, not you, as the consumers. With a world of information at their fingertips, and the savvy to maneuver it, they are looking for something that satisfies them.
• Look ahead. You might have to market yourself as a good place to work. Think sensibilities, challenges, lessons, opportunities, the future.
• Create. A company must creatively market its employer brand to each segment of worker it hopes to secure.
• Segment. As with marketing, segmenting means adapting the talent brand message for each segment based on insight into audience needs and preferences.
• Implement. Be recognized, believed, personalized, and remembered.
• Sustain. There must be alignment of the culture, corporate identity and the consumer and employer brands.
• Survive. Be aware of and utilize social media to your benefit.
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
Convio Expands Across The Pond
Just in time for Independence Day, Convio has announced plans to purchase the British company Baigent Digital. The Austin-based online fundraising and constituent management (CRM) firm, which serves more than 1,400 nonprofits, payed $2.9 million for Baigent, and may be on the hook for another $400,000 depending on the performance of the company.
Founded in 1997, Baigent is one of the UK's leading digital strategy, design and technology implementation firms. The current plan is for Convio to offer their fundraising services to British charities. At a later, yet to be determined date, they will offer additional services, including CRM.
You can get the full scoop on this story by visiting The NonProfit Times, or you can go to Convio.com for even more info.
Founded in 1997, Baigent is one of the UK's leading digital strategy, design and technology implementation firms. The current plan is for Convio to offer their fundraising services to British charities. At a later, yet to be determined date, they will offer additional services, including CRM.
You can get the full scoop on this story by visiting The NonProfit Times, or you can go to Convio.com for even more info.
Council on Foundations CEO Set to Step Down
Steve Gunderson, President/CEO of The Council on Foundations, has announced his intentions to resign his position on September 1st.
In a statement posted on CoF's website, Gunderson said that it was "the right time for a transition" in leadership. He went on to say that he reached his decision after a lengthy discussion with Board Leadership. No successor has been named at this time, but Gunderson is confident the Board will appoint a new CEO who will continue the organization's success and "propel the council to new levels of greatness."
Gunderson leaves behind a very impressive list of accomplishments at The Council on Foundations. Among other things, he was responsible for helping the organization move from its DC offices to its current home in Arlington, VA. He also added 100 members to their roster in the past two years, while maintaining strong retention rates at the same time. Avid readers of The NonProfit Times will also know that he was named to our "Power and Influence Top 50" lists in each of the past five years.
Gunderson's leadership will surely be missed at CoF, but executive transitions happen all the time as our readers know well. Please feel free to post your reactions to this news in the comments section below, and remember to read the full story at The NonProfit Times.
In a statement posted on CoF's website, Gunderson said that it was "the right time for a transition" in leadership. He went on to say that he reached his decision after a lengthy discussion with Board Leadership. No successor has been named at this time, but Gunderson is confident the Board will appoint a new CEO who will continue the organization's success and "propel the council to new levels of greatness."
Gunderson leaves behind a very impressive list of accomplishments at The Council on Foundations. Among other things, he was responsible for helping the organization move from its DC offices to its current home in Arlington, VA. He also added 100 members to their roster in the past two years, while maintaining strong retention rates at the same time. Avid readers of The NonProfit Times will also know that he was named to our "Power and Influence Top 50" lists in each of the past five years.
Gunderson's leadership will surely be missed at CoF, but executive transitions happen all the time as our readers know well. Please feel free to post your reactions to this news in the comments section below, and remember to read the full story at The NonProfit Times.
Friday, July 1, 2011
July 1st Issue of NPTimes Released
Start checking your mailboxes: The July 1st issue of The NonProfit Times has been released! This issue features a Special Report on the Giving USA numbers, as well as articles on topic ranging from Reel Grrls battle with Comcast, to the nonprofits that recently had their tax-exempt status revoked. Here's a list of some of the pieces included in the new edition:
Interested in getting a sneak peek at the new issue? Head on over to The NonProfit Times home page and scroll down to "Current Edition." Here you can take a look at three of the articles in the magazine, as well as the Special Report and two columns.
- "Reel Grrls Vs. Media Giant"
- "Being There, But Not Really"
- "Long Road Back For Exemption-Revoked Groups"
- Column: "Yeah, So?"
- Column: "Hot Copy"
- Special Report: "Giving Pegged At $290.89 Billion, Maybe"
Interested in getting a sneak peek at the new issue? Head on over to The NonProfit Times home page and scroll down to "Current Edition." Here you can take a look at three of the articles in the magazine, as well as the Special Report and two columns.
Thursday, June 30, 2011
DC School Sports Saved By Anonymous Donation
Note: This is a summary of a story from an outside news organization. Follow the links in the post to read the full article.
Sports in Washington D.C.'s public schools had been going through some tough times. Faced with a 28% budget cut, they were suddenly saved by an anonymous $1.5-million donation. According to a story in The Washington Examiner, the money went to the D.C. Public Education Fund, a nonprofit dedicated to finding money for public schools in the District. This new influx of cash will allow the school to purchase new athletic equipment and add sports programs for girls.
The Examiner story states that school officials became aware of the donation during the fiscal year, so some parents and community members are frustrated that they weren't made aware of the donation after spending countless hours fundraising. The D.C. Public Education Fund explained that they don't publicize a gift when the donor wishes to remain anonymous. Even though the donation is sure to boost sports in D.C.'s public schools, some parents are still not sure whether they will cancel their fundraising plans. They are skeptical of the secretive nature of the donation, and want to know the plans are for next year's budget.
If you are interested in reading the rest of this story, visit the website of The Washington Examiner.
Sports in Washington D.C.'s public schools had been going through some tough times. Faced with a 28% budget cut, they were suddenly saved by an anonymous $1.5-million donation. According to a story in The Washington Examiner, the money went to the D.C. Public Education Fund, a nonprofit dedicated to finding money for public schools in the District. This new influx of cash will allow the school to purchase new athletic equipment and add sports programs for girls.
The Examiner story states that school officials became aware of the donation during the fiscal year, so some parents and community members are frustrated that they weren't made aware of the donation after spending countless hours fundraising. The D.C. Public Education Fund explained that they don't publicize a gift when the donor wishes to remain anonymous. Even though the donation is sure to boost sports in D.C.'s public schools, some parents are still not sure whether they will cancel their fundraising plans. They are skeptical of the secretive nature of the donation, and want to know the plans are for next year's budget.
If you are interested in reading the rest of this story, visit the website of The Washington Examiner.
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
NPTtv Summary: 9/11 Charities After Bin Laden
It was the news many September 11th charities had been waiting for: Osama Bin Laden is dead.
But even after the death of 9/11 mastermind in May, these charities insist their will be no changes in the work they do. For example, Voices of September 11th still held its annual fundraising gala in New York City, featuring former Mayor Rudy Giuliani. In addition, plans for the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks are still moving forward.
Other charities are following this path as well. World Cares Center Executive Director Lisa Orloff says that she believes the news of Bin Laden’s death will have no affect on their anniversary event, or their fundraising strategies. Orloff did not plan to comment specifically on Bin Laden's death, but she did say her group's outreach towards communities would adjust to this monumental change. She did not, however, go into specifics.
But even after the death of 9/11 mastermind in May, these charities insist their will be no changes in the work they do. For example, Voices of September 11th still held its annual fundraising gala in New York City, featuring former Mayor Rudy Giuliani. In addition, plans for the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks are still moving forward.
Other charities are following this path as well. World Cares Center Executive Director Lisa Orloff says that she believes the news of Bin Laden’s death will have no affect on their anniversary event, or their fundraising strategies. Orloff did not plan to comment specifically on Bin Laden's death, but she did say her group's outreach towards communities would adjust to this monumental change. She did not, however, go into specifics.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)